---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: vanderkok [via Pixelpipe] <postmaster-noreply@pixelpipe.com>
Date: Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:03 AM
Subject: 1/12 WASH POST & NY TIMES MISCHARACTERIZE & IGNORE MARCH 4 LIFE IN WASH DC: "...ts, praying at the pro-aborts, or clutching rosary beads or pictures of Mary near the pro-aborts. Mary near the pro-aborts The caption on one of the Post’s photo reads “Freezing rain Monday morning was said to have imited attendance for both groups.” In response to which Media Research Center writer Tim Graham quipped: “Yes, Post readers: the pro-lifers were limited to many thousands, and the abortion advocates were limited to about 11. The ratio could be a thousand to one, and the newspaper treats them like one versus one.” Click “like” if you want to end abortion! But I suppose we can at least give the Post credit for covering the event at all. The Media Research Center (MRC) reports that the New York Times completely ignored the event for the fifth year in a row Humorously, the Times even ran a “Happenings in Washington” blog post Monday that mentioned that the Boston Bruins were set
To: vanderkok@gmail.com
1/12 WASH POST & NY TIMES MISCHARACTERIZE & IGNORE MARCH 4 LIFE IN WASH DC: "...ts, praying at the pro-aborts, or clutching rosary beads or pictures of Mary near the pro-aborts. Mary near the pro-aborts The caption on one of the Post’s photo reads “Freezing rain Monday morning was said to have imited attendance for both groups.” In response to which Media Research Center writer Tim Graham quipped: “Yes, Post readers: the pro-lifers were limited to many thousands, and the abortion advocates were limited to about 11. The ratio could be a thousand to one, and the newspaper treats them like one versus one.” Click “like” if you want to end abortion! But I suppose we can at least give the Post credit for covering the event at all. The Media Research Center (MRC) reports that the New York Times completely ignored the event for the fifth year in a row Humorously, the Times even ran a “Happenings in Washington” blog post Monday that mentioned that the Boston Bruins were set to be honored by Obama, and that South Korea’s ambassador to the United States would be in town to sign an environmental agreement Oh yeah, and there will be hordes of people, most of them young, swarming the city peacefully demanding the end of the slaughter of millions of American babies in the womb. Would that qualify as a “happening” in Washington? Apparently not according to the New York Times Clay Waters of MRC points out: “Even the two references made about the march at nytimes.com were accidental, done to explain where Sen. Rand Paul was headed when he was stopped at airport security by TSA in Nashville.” The mainstream media bias surrounding the annual March for Life is so ubiquitous and so brazen that it has become shrug-worthy, and the ..." http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/new-york-times-ignores-march-for-life-for-fifth-year-in-a-row-wapo-focuses
From: vanderkok [via Pixelpipe] <postmaster-noreply@pixelpipe.com>
Date: Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:03 AM
Subject: 1/12 WASH POST & NY TIMES MISCHARACTERIZE & IGNORE MARCH 4 LIFE IN WASH DC: "...ts, praying at the pro-aborts, or clutching rosary beads or pictures of Mary near the pro-aborts. Mary near the pro-aborts The caption on one of the Post’s photo reads “Freezing rain Monday morning was said to have imited attendance for both groups.” In response to which Media Research Center writer Tim Graham quipped: “Yes, Post readers: the pro-lifers were limited to many thousands, and the abortion advocates were limited to about 11. The ratio could be a thousand to one, and the newspaper treats them like one versus one.” Click “like” if you want to end abortion! But I suppose we can at least give the Post credit for covering the event at all. The Media Research Center (MRC) reports that the New York Times completely ignored the event for the fifth year in a row Humorously, the Times even ran a “Happenings in Washington” blog post Monday that mentioned that the Boston Bruins were set
To: vanderkok@gmail.com
1/12 WASH POST & NY TIMES MISCHARACTERIZE & IGNORE MARCH 4 LIFE IN WASH DC: "...ts, praying at the pro-aborts, or clutching rosary beads or pictures of Mary near the pro-aborts. Mary near the pro-aborts The caption on one of the Post’s photo reads “Freezing rain Monday morning was said to have imited attendance for both groups.” In response to which Media Research Center writer Tim Graham quipped: “Yes, Post readers: the pro-lifers were limited to many thousands, and the abortion advocates were limited to about 11. The ratio could be a thousand to one, and the newspaper treats them like one versus one.” Click “like” if you want to end abortion! But I suppose we can at least give the Post credit for covering the event at all. The Media Research Center (MRC) reports that the New York Times completely ignored the event for the fifth year in a row Humorously, the Times even ran a “Happenings in Washington” blog post Monday that mentioned that the Boston Bruins were set to be honored by Obama, and that South Korea’s ambassador to the United States would be in town to sign an environmental agreement Oh yeah, and there will be hordes of people, most of them young, swarming the city peacefully demanding the end of the slaughter of millions of American babies in the womb. Would that qualify as a “happening” in Washington? Apparently not according to the New York Times Clay Waters of MRC points out: “Even the two references made about the march at nytimes.com were accidental, done to explain where Sen. Rand Paul was headed when he was stopped at airport security by TSA in Nashville.” The mainstream media bias surrounding the annual March for Life is so ubiquitous and so brazen that it has become shrug-worthy, and the ..." http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/new-york-times-ignores-march-for-life-for-fifth-year-in-a-row-wapo-focuses
